Account Entries

The following entries in Feoffee accounts for 1766 to 1866 mention Robert Roberts.

Date Name Type Description Amount (£ s d)   Building link
22/2/1766 Robin Roberts support 0 - 05 - 03  
none
14/10/1766 Robert Roberts support 0 - 02 - 06  
none
16/10/1766 Robert Roberts support 0 - 02 - 06  
none
15/12/1766 Robin Roberts support 0 - 10 - 06  
none
3/1/1767 Robin Roberts support 0 - 05 - 06  
none
21/11/1767 Robin Roberts support 0 - 07 - 06  
none
4/1/1768 Robin Roberts support A second time 0 - 05 - 03  
none
10/12/1768 Robin Roberts support 0 - 07 - 06  
none
16/2/1769 Robin Roberts support 0 - 05 - 03  
none
4/12/1769 Robin Roberts support 0 - 10 - 06  
none
1/2/1770 Robin Roberts support 0 - 05 - 06  
none
2/2/1771 Robin Roberts support 0 - 07 - 06  
none
13/1/1772 Robin Roberts support 0 - 05 - 03  
none
13/1/1772 Robin Roberts support 0 - 03 - 00  
none
21/12/1772 Robert Roberts support 0 - 10 - 06  
none
1/1/1773 Robin Roberts support In want 0 - 02 - 00  
none
10/1/1774 Robin Roberts support 0 - 03 - 00  
none
20/12/1774 Robin Roberts support 0 - 05 - 03  
none
8/2/1776 Robin Roberts support 0 - 05 - 03  
none
29/1/1777 Robin Roberts support 0 - 04 - 00  
none
9/2/1778 Robert Roberts support 0 - 02 - 06  
none
Notes:  
  The Feoffee was a charity which owned several properties and provide aid to the poor from the income derived from these properties. Two Feoffee ledgers survive for the period 1766 to 1866. They record only payments. During this period, it appears that the Feoffee owned Stafford House which was being run as a work house. There are no expenditures recorded for the support of people in the workhouse. It seems likely that this fell on the trustees for the poor rate. The payment are of two types: - support payments to beneficiaries, occasionally with a brief explanation of why the support was needed - payments for services or taxes, usually connected with the maintenance of feoffee properties, sometimes with an indication of the work Most of the support payments are made in the winter months, presumably because there was insufficient agricultural work to provide employment for everyone in these months.